<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UNBALANCED COVERAGE?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vote08.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/22/unbalanced-coverage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vote08.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/22/unbalanced-coverage/2215/</link>
	<description>Tracking the 2008 Campaign in the Tennessee Valley</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: C. Waller</title>
		<link>http://vote08.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/22/unbalanced-coverage/2215/#comment-579</link>
		<dc:creator>C. Waller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vote08.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/22/unbalanced-coverage/#comment-579</guid>
		<description>I'm sure that it wasn't meant to be biased, but the on-going coverage of Mr. Obama makes many believe that "the news media" is looking for another champion.  I truly wish that all news media would just report the news and not try to make or sway it.  That tends to not only take away credibility from the news agencies, but it also leads many to just "down-right" distrust them.  That's not at all good; not for the media and certainly not for the country.  At least try to show the better side of both candidates and not just point out their mistakes.  Thank you for at least asking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure that it wasn&#8217;t meant to be biased, but the on-going coverage of Mr. Obama makes many believe that &#8220;the news media&#8221; is looking for another champion.  I truly wish that all news media would just report the news and not try to make or sway it.  That tends to not only take away credibility from the news agencies, but it also leads many to just &#8220;down-right&#8221; distrust them.  That&#8217;s not at all good; not for the media and certainly not for the country.  At least try to show the better side of both candidates and not just point out their mistakes.  Thank you for at least asking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis Priddy</title>
		<link>http://vote08.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/22/unbalanced-coverage/2215/#comment-577</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis Priddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 21:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vote08.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/22/unbalanced-coverage/#comment-577</guid>
		<description>Of course it is unbalanced!  It has been since Obama announced his campaign for the presidency.  No one in the news media has questioned him why, if he is interested in the Iraq situation, he has not visited in the last 900 days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course it is unbalanced!  It has been since Obama announced his campaign for the presidency.  No one in the news media has questioned him why, if he is interested in the Iraq situation, he has not visited in the last 900 days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://vote08.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/22/unbalanced-coverage/2215/#comment-575</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vote08.freedomblogging.com/2008/07/22/unbalanced-coverage/#comment-575</guid>
		<description>Perhaps his remark about  the Iraq/Pakistani border was in reference to a post-McCain presidency when Iran will no longer exist.

Just guessin'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps his remark about  the Iraq/Pakistani border was in reference to a post-McCain presidency when Iran will no longer exist.</p>
<p>Just guessin&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
